1,000,000 + Attorneys and Legal Staff - Legal employers hire more people on LawCrossing than any other site.
California Bill Offers $3 Million to Immigrants
California Bill Offers $3 Million to Immigrants
Florida Same-Sex Marriage Ban Defeated by Judge
Florida Same-Sex Marriage Ban Defeated by Judge
Lawyers Helping Protesters in Ferguson Arrested
Lawyers Helping Protesters in Ferguson Arrested
Cleary Gottlieb Blamed for Argentine Default on Bonds
Cleary Gottlieb Blamed for Argentine Default on Bonds
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Job Listings

Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Race-Related Admissions Case

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

 

On Monday, the Supreme Court decided that it would dig further into affirmative action at university admissions, according to The Washington Post. The court agreed that it would review the decision of a lower court to overturn the voter-approved initiative that bans the use of  race in decisions of college acceptance in Michigan.

The ban was defeated by the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit after it was approved by 58 percent of the voters in the state of Michigan in 2006. The ban is very similar to ones in Florida and California.

The appeal of the opinion from the 6th Circuit Court by Michigan has been accepted by the Supreme Court. It will begin hearing the case in the term that starts in October. Justice Elena Kagan has recused herself from the case, so only eight justices will hear the case.

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Earlier in the current term, the court considered a challenge to the process used by the admissions office at the University of Texas. The admissions office considers race as a factor when it chooses its freshman class. The court has yet to issue a ruling after hearing arguments in October.

The majority of the appeals court ruled that the ban “reorders the political process in Michigan to place special burdens on minority interests” while also violating the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection.

Attorney General Bill Schuette (R) wrote the following to the Supreme Court: “Michigan recognizes that affirmative action has long been controversial; some state entities use it for some programs, some do not. But until now, no court has ever held that, apart from remedying specific past discrimination, a government must engage in affirmative action.”

Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Race-Related Admissions Case by

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Tagged: , , , ,

Posted by on March 25, 2013. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Real Estate Associate
USA-TX-Dallas

Our client is a north Dallas law firm who seeks a Real Estate Development Associate.  The ideal candidate will have 2-4 years law firm experience concentrated in representing real estate develope...