On Wednesday, court filings said that prosecutors working the James Holmes Colorado movie theater shooting case urged a judge to reject a motion from the defense. The defense filed a motion to declare the insanity defense law unconstitutional, according to Reuters.
Arapahoe County District Judge William Sylvester was asked last week by Holmes’ attorneys to declare the Colorado insanity defense law unconstitutional. The reason is that it compels defendants who plead insanity to cooperate with psychiatrists appointed by the court.
 |
|||
 |
|
Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!! |
|
Defense lawyers argued that the scenario could force Holmes to offer possibly incriminating statements that could be used against him at trial and in sentencing if he is convicted. In the motion from the prosecution, the team said, “It is well established law in Colorado that submitting to court ordered evaluation does not violate a defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.”
Holmes is supposed to enter his plea sometime next week. Holmes has been charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder and attempted murder for the shooting in July that killed 12 people and injured 58 at a midnight showing of “The Dark Knight Rises” in Aurora, Colorado.
Following the entering of a plea, prosecutors then have 60 days to announce if they will seek the death penalty. George Brauchler, the Arapahoe County District Attorney, noted last month that he added a death penalty lawyer to the team of prosecutors.
Posted by Jim Vassallo
on March 7, 2013. Filed under Legal News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Attorney Career Resources is sponsored by BCG Attorney Search, the nation's leading placement firm, specializing in law firm placements.
Law firms of all sizes are being much more selective about who makes equity partner. Gone are the days where doing good work and putting in your time is enough to get you to a profit sharing level. Today, equity partners almost always have to prove that they can contribute their share to the firm. So what does this mean for associates and how can a two-tiered partnership track be beneficial? With a two-tiered partnership structure, associates get more time to prove themselves and also more time to determine whether partnership is the right goal for them. Two-tier partnerships (non-equity and equity) exist so the firm can train and develop associates into equity partners. The non-equity track to partner at most firms is on average, 6 years long. [...]
May 16, 2013 Read More
 |
||
| Search Thousands of Legal Jobs | ||
|
Job Type: |
||
 |
||
|
Browse Jobs by Location: |
||
|
||
| Keyword Search: | ||
|
||
Recent comments