Promote Your Attorney Profile on Law.net - Get Found / Earn More!
Bankruptcy Judge Refuses to Drop Dewey & LeBoeuf Suit
Bankruptcy Judge Refuses to Drop Dewey & LeBoeuf Suit
Greeeeat Tiger Costume Leads to Bestiality Charge
Greeeeat Tiger Costume Leads to Bestiality Charge
Former CIO of Mayer Brown Sentenced to 27 Months in Prison
Former CIO of Mayer Brown Sentenced to 27 Months in Prison
Joan Rivers’ Death Investigated by NYC Law Firm
Joan Rivers’ Death Investigated by NYC Law Firm
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Legal Job Listings

Arizona Immigration Law Targeting Day Laborers Blocked by Appeals Court

On Monday, in a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found a controversial portion of the Arizona immigration law that targeted day laborers to be unconstitutional, and upheld a February 2012 decision of a district judge to block the law.

While the U.S. Supreme Court has already struck down most of the Arizona immigration law launched in 2010 by Governor Jan Brewer last year, parts of the law continued to exist and confuse people. The matter in the Supreme Court had primarily been fought over the jurisdiction of federal government to control immigration, and to what extent an individual state may impose its own rules.

The section concerned in the instant case made it a crime if a motorist stopped to hire a day laborer and traffic was blocked. The section also prohibited any day laborer from entering a car that is obstructing traffic.

The Ninth Circuit held the law exceeded the scope of state authority in restricting commercial free speech rights.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Attorneys for the state argued that the state’s sole intention was to promote traffic safety, but the Ninth Circuit did not buy the argument and observed the law was “motivated by a desire to eliminate the livelihoods of undocumented immigrants.” The opinion added, “Laws that limit commercial speech must not be more extensive than necessary to serve a substantial government interest.”

Governor Jan Brewer’s spokesman, Matthew Benson, said the governor is discussing the possibility of appeal and that “this is an important tool to give law enforcement.”

Pablo Alvarado, director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, and whose group was co-counsel in the matter, told the media, “It is fundamentally wrong to criminalize work, to criminalize people who are looking for work to feed their loved ones.”

Arizona Immigration Law Targeting Day Laborers Blocked by Appeals Court by

  • John30303

    That’s OK, the government doesn’t have enough money to lock up the law breakers anyway.

  • Robert

    but the Ninth Circuit did not buy the argument and observed the law was “motivated by a desire to eliminate the livelihoods of undocumented immigrants.”

    So let me get this straight. The state is not allowed to enact laws that interfere with the rights of someone in this country illegally getting a job? So the law would have been legal if it interfered with the rights of legal workers from getting a job?

Tagged:

Posted by on March 5, 2013. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Paralegal
USA-CA-Thousand Oaks

Candidate will assist attorney and team with estate planning, probate and trust administration, court accountings, business formation, governance, and succession planning.  This could be a part o...

Related Posts: