Pole Dancing Tax Case Headed to Supreme Court

On Thursday, the New York Court of Appeals denied Nite Moves, an Albany strip club, a motion to reargue its case challenging the decision of state tax authorities, which levied a $125,000 tax bill on the club. The club had argued that it qualifies for a state tax exemption for dramatic or musical arts performances. However, according to the tax authorities, pole dancing did not qualify for the exemption.

Last year, the appeals court had ruled in favor of the state in a 4-3 decision.

Upon denial of the motion to reargue, the club seeks to take the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court.

		Get JD Journal in Your Mail Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

In September, during a hearing, Andrew McCullough, the club’s attorney had emphasized to the court, “If you saw what these dancers do, you’d be saying, ‘it’s not the Bolshoi, but it’s good.”

In counter, Assistant Solicitor General Robert Godfarb had said, “If the women kept their clothes on, no one would be coming to this bar for the dance performances.”

The appeals court, ultimately did not buy the arguments of the strip club.

However, the 4-3 decision by which the earlier decision went in favor of the state was also narrow.

In a strong dissent, Judge Robert Smith had observed that comparing different types of dancing was “not the function of a tax collector.” Smith wrote, “The people who paid these admission charges paid to see women dancing. It does not matter if the dance was artistic or crude, boring or erotic.”

However, tax authorities maintain that in order to qualify for exemption, a performance would have to follow strict choreography, which was not maintained in pole dancing.

But, during the last arguments at the appeals court Judge Susan Read had noted that even ballet dancers often improvised and would fail the test of strict choreography, and Judge Lippman remarked that the state was arguing that any improvisational dance did not merit tax exemption.

However, it may be time to see what the U.S. Supreme Court says on the issue, and that is what the club owners intend to find out.

Posted by Scott on February 9, 2013. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.