Free Market Evaluation - Send us your resume and we will give you free feedback
Teen Version of Bonnie and Clyde Arrested in Florida
Teen Version of Bonnie and Clyde Arrested in Florida
Plan to Bomb Capitol Lands Ohio Man in Jail
Plan to Bomb Capitol Lands Ohio Man in Jail
Web Could be Reclassified as Utility, Tech Group Explains
Web Could be Reclassified as Utility, Tech Group Explains
Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Apple for iOS 8 Storage Issues
Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Apple for iOS 8 Storage Issues
Legal Job Listings

Court Rules the Term “App Store” is Not Property of Apple

On Wednesday, in Apple’s lawsuit against Amazon, the court held that Apple cannot bring a claim of false advertising against Amazon for using the term “App Store.” Granting Amazon’s motion for partial summary judgment, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in Oakland, California observed, “Apple has failed to establish that Amazon made any false statement (express or implied) of fact that actually deceived or had the tendency to deceive a substantial segment of its audience.” She scheduled the trial on Apple’s remaining claims against Amazon for August.

In the lawsuit, Apple had accused Amazon of using the term “App Store” misleadingly to solicit developers for a download service of mobile software. However, Amazon argued that the term “App Store” has become generic and its use does not constitute false advertising.

Last year, in its legal filing, Amazon also mentioned that the term “App Store” was used generically even by the past and present CEOs of Apple. Amazon filed proof that Tim Cook had commented on “the number of app stores out there” and Steve Jobs had in the past referred to “four app stores on Android.”

In her ruling, judge Hamilton commented that the mere use of the term “App Store” by Amazon does not lead to a representation that its services are the same as that of Apple’s.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case is Apple Inc v. Amazon.com Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 11-01327.

Court Rules the Term “App Store” is Not Property of Apple by

Tagged: , , ,

Posted by on January 3, 2013. Filed under Breaking News,Tech & Science News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Capital Markets Attorney
USA-DC-Washington

Capital Markets Associate - DC Am Law 100 firm seeks a highly credentialed Capital Markets Associate to join their Group in Washington, D.C. This firm presents an opportunity for a top mid-level...

Related Posts: