Promote Your Attorney Profile on Law.net - Get Found / Earn More!
Apple Must Pay 20 Million for Patent Infringement
Apple Must Pay 20 Million for Patent Infringement
Actress Diane Guerrero Talks about Deportation of Her Family
Actress Diane Guerrero Talks about Deportation of Her Family
State of Emergency Declared in Missouri in Anticipation of Grand Jury’s Decision
State of Emergency Declared in Missouri in Anticipation of Grand Jury&...
Attack at Jerusalem Synagogue Kills Four Worshipers
Attack at Jerusalem Synagogue Kills Four Worshipers
Legal Job Listings

Court Rules the Term “App Store” is Not Property of Apple

On Wednesday, in Apple’s lawsuit against Amazon, the court held that Apple cannot bring a claim of false advertising against Amazon for using the term “App Store.” Granting Amazon’s motion for partial summary judgment, U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in Oakland, California observed, “Apple has failed to establish that Amazon made any false statement (express or implied) of fact that actually deceived or had the tendency to deceive a substantial segment of its audience.” She scheduled the trial on Apple’s remaining claims against Amazon for August.

In the lawsuit, Apple had accused Amazon of using the term “App Store” misleadingly to solicit developers for a download service of mobile software. However, Amazon argued that the term “App Store” has become generic and its use does not constitute false advertising.

Last year, in its legal filing, Amazon also mentioned that the term “App Store” was used generically even by the past and present CEOs of Apple. Amazon filed proof that Tim Cook had commented on “the number of app stores out there” and Steve Jobs had in the past referred to “four app stores on Android.”

In her ruling, judge Hamilton commented that the mere use of the term “App Store” by Amazon does not lead to a representation that its services are the same as that of Apple’s.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case is Apple Inc v. Amazon.com Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 11-01327.

Court Rules the Term “App Store” is Not Property of Apple by

Tagged: , , ,

Posted by on January 3, 2013. Filed under Breaking News,Tech & Science News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Managing Counsel
USA-OH-Columbus

Primary Responsibilities • Provide legal and regulatory support to Meeder and its subsidiaries, as well as to the Meeder Funds. • Work with senior business executives on new product ...

Related Posts: