The world’s most famous painting has a predecessor, says The Mona Lisa Foundation. The Zurich based foundation unveiled a version of the Mona Lisa which they claim predates the more famous Mona Lisa that is hanging in the Louvre Museum of Paris. The supposed predecessor lacks the mysterious smile that has dazzled art-goers for centuries, but is clearly a version of the Mona Lisa.
The foundation offers a 320-page book to back up its claims that it is Leonardo’s, using painting to painting comparisons to justify its attribution.
Martin Kemp thinks differently. The professor emeritus at Oxford University has concluded that the the painting is most likely a copy that came after Leonardo’s was complete. The purported earlier version, called the “Isleworth Mona Lisa,” gives some clues to its late date. As he explains it:
 |
|||
 |
|
Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!! |
|
“The Isleworth picture follows the final state of the Louvre painting. It does not therefore precede the Louvre painting.” The original Mona Lisa was changed into its final condition from a previous state; the Isleworth follows its altered and final state.
Secondly, he points out that forensics contradict the likelihood that it is a Leonardo original. “The images produced by infrared reflectography and X-ray are not at all characteristic [of] what lies below Leonardo’s autograph paintings,” said Kemp.
He says that The Mona Lisa Institute’s arguments rely on inconclusive evidence such as 16th century quotes to suggest there was a second portrait.
Alessandro Vezzosi, director of the Museo Ideale Leonardo da Vinci also doesn’t fully endorse their claims, but nor is he as dismissive as Kemp. “I believe it is more than possible that there existed two pieces of art,” he said, but nevertheless regards “The ‘Isleworth Mona Lisa’ [as] an important work of art deserving respect and strong consideration as well as scientific, historic, and artistic debate among specialists rather than a purely media interest.”
Posted by Daniel June
on September 28, 2012. Filed under Breaking News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Attorney Career Resources is sponsored by BCG Attorney Search, the nation's leading placement firm, specializing in law firm placements.
Here at BCG we get no small number of inquiries from attorneys who have recently (e.g., within the past year) switched firms but, for a wide variety of reasons, find themselves wanting and/or needing to move again and thus want to resume their job search. The reasons for this most often include the following – sometimes a spouse receives a job offer in another market. Sometimes a group of partners makes an untimely departure, leading to business in your new practice group drying up and you sitting at the mercy of a first-in-first-out policy when the inevitable downsizing occurs. Sometimes the firm turns out not to be quite what you expected in terms of opportunity, professionalism, or personality, and you soon find yourself realizing that you may have [...]
June 6, 2013 Read More
 |
||
| Search Thousands of Legal Jobs | ||
|
Job Type: |
||
 |
||
|
Browse Jobs by Location: |
||
|
||
| Keyword Search: | ||
|
||
Recent comments