When Ralph Zucker, president of Somerset Development of Lakewood, was attacked by anonymous blog postings, he struggled to pinpoint who to administer a defamation suit. What to do? Why not force Google to expose the bloggers? The New Jersey appeals court, however, barred the attempt, claiming that since he was a public figure and the blogs addressed public concern, the “rhetorical hyperbole” was nonactionable.
The blog in question, clearlakewood.blogspot.com, had referred to Zucker as a “rip off artist,” and an “under the table crook,” who had “shortchanged the taxpayers with millions,” and “cost taxpayers when he took a piece of township land on County Line Road without paying for it,” among a few other similar comments.
The plaintiffs claimed that the statements accused their client of criminal behavior — thus making the suit actionable, but the Superior Court Judge Frank Buczynski Jr. disagreed, saying that, that the statements were unlikely to be interpreted that way.
 |
|||
 |
|
Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!! |
|
Nevertheless, the suit raises questions about what to do if the blog insults had in fact been actionable. The Somerset Development had to resort to posting their subpoenas to the comment section of the offending blog entries, and though the defendants argued this was insufficient, Buczynski said it was the only way.
Nevertheless, with this case it didn’t come to ferreting out anonymous bloggers. As the defense’s lawyer, Richard Ravin, said, as reported by New Jersey Law Journal, “I think this case is a good example of the court acting as a gatekeeper to protect against the unconstitutional intrusion on one’s anonymous free speech rights on the internet.”
The prosecutors rued that this left those like their client “effectively defenseless from shadowy attack,” but as the internet is right now, this is both one of its virtues and vices: speech is often de facto beyond the law.
Posted by Daniel June
on September 28, 2012. Filed under Google,Legal News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Attorney Career Resources is sponsored by BCG Attorney Search, the nation's leading placement firm, specializing in law firm placements.
Law firms of all sizes are being much more selective about who makes equity partner. Gone are the days where doing good work and putting in your time is enough to get you to a profit sharing level. Today, equity partners almost always have to prove that they can contribute their share to the firm. So what does this mean for associates and how can a two-tiered partnership track be beneficial? With a two-tiered partnership structure, associates get more time to prove themselves and also more time to determine whether partnership is the right goal for them. Two-tier partnerships (non-equity and equity) exist so the firm can train and develop associates into equity partners. The non-equity track to partner at most firms is on average, 6 years long. [...]
May 16, 2013 Read More
 |
||
| Search Thousands of Legal Jobs | ||
|
Job Type: |
||
 |
||
|
Browse Jobs by Location: |
||
|
||
| Keyword Search: | ||
|
||
lorielevine
September 29, 2012 at 11:20 am
The trouble with all security measures is that they are instituted by people whose legitimcy and fallibility are as much of concern as those they are checking on. Who makes sure that security is decent, because they have left a lot to be desired. We run the risk of terrism either way.