Free Market Evaluation - Send us your resume and we will give you free feedback
Visa and MasterCard Want Settlement to Move Forward
Visa and MasterCard Want Settlement to Move Forward
Illinois Attorney Goes off the Deep End Harassing a Client
Illinois Attorney Goes off the Deep End Harassing a Client
Rowan County Clerk Sent to Jail
Rowan County Clerk Sent to Jail
Three BP Employees Facing Federal Indictment Charges
Three BP Employees Facing Federal Indictment Charges
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Legal Job Listings
Download PDF

Six-Year Battle Over Washington Redskins Name Continues View Count: 210

A legal battle involving the Washington Redskins and a group of Native Americans is still raging today as attorneys for the group are set to file documents that will ask federal authorities to defeat multiple trademark registrations of the team. The documents claim that the team’s name is a racial slur. The lawsuit, Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc., probably will not have a large impact on the operations of the team. The reason for this is that trademark authorities do not have the power to stop the sale of products that have Redskin logos on them. The authorities also do not have the power to order damages. If the team begins to operate without a registered trademark then counterfeiters will find it easier to sell bad gear.

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Jesse Witten, from Drinker Biddle & Reath, is representing the group of Native Americans. The group’s leader is Amanda Blackhorse. Witten said, the petition “makes an important statement about the disparaging nature of the team’s name. We know the vast majority of team’s fans aren’t racist, but the fact remains they’re rooting for a team whose name is a racial slur.” The trademarks being disputed include the cheerleaders, known as the Reskinettes, and the logo that features a Native American on the helmets.

The lawsuit was filed in 2006 with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, which is a section of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The suit was paused from 2006 to 2010 as another case, Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo, climbed through the courts. The team won the suit in 2003 when a judge said that there was no evidence to prove that the name Redskins is disparaging enough to stop a trademark. Robert L. Raskopf, from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, is the attorney for Pro-Football, Inc., which owns the Redskins.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




“We think the trial judge in D.C. a long time ago ruled there was no substantial evidence the [trade]mark disparaged Native Americans,” Raskopf said. “The team is one of most well-known pro football teams in the U.S. and a well-respected franchise, that’s what the Washington Redskins means to the public and we’ve demonstrated that to the satisfaction of a court.”

Six-Year Battle Over Washington Redskins Name Continues by

Tagged: , , , , ,

Posted by on September 7, 2012. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Related Posts: