Dewey Revamps Their Partner Contribution Plan, Expecting More From Leaders and Less From Other Partners

Dewey’s “partnership contribution plan,” which attempted to garner $103.6 from former partners in exchange for immunity to clawbacks, has failed to gain the funds necessary. The plan would charge former employees a percentage of their earnings between 2011 and 2012. There were too many complaints against it, such as that higher paid partners were not charged more than lower paid partners, and that the time period unfairly penalized partners who happened to receive a late bonus in 2011. Over 1,000 emails addressed these concerns and forced a rewrite. A freshly drafted plan, therefore, addressing some, but not all these issues, has been issued.

The revamped plan needs to accrue $90.4 million instead of $103.6 million, so that 672 partners need participate instead of 709, paying $5,000 as a minimum instead of $25,000, but bumping the maximum for higher paid partners from $3 million to $3.5 million. The plan’s deadline has also been pushed back to August 7.

In return for their contribution, not only will partners gain immunity from clawbacks, which are the suits initiated by debtors against former partners of a bankrupt firm, but their K-1 tax plans will also be paid. The thirty plus partners who sat on the governing body, meanwhile – there are over 30 – are expected to pay an extra 20 percent of their 2011-2012 earnings.

		Get JD Journal in Your Mail Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

As Am Law Daily reports, that higher premium “does not reflect a conclusion that any EC member breached a duty or bears responsibility for the firm’s failure, but does acknowledge that EC members bear a greater risk of suit from claims that are being released under the PCP.”

It is hoped that these patches on the plan will impress former partners enough to get on board so that they can meet their minimum. Only a few outstanding problems remain, such as that there was no accommodation to partners who were given their 2010 bonus late, in 2011, thus inflating the amount they are expected to contribute.

Posted by Daniel June on July 27, 2012. Filed under Dewey & LeBoeuf,Law Firm News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.