Craig Raneberg has received the inevitable now that he’s been sentenced ten years for embezzling nearly $2.7 million from the Adelaide branch of Australian firm Minter Ellison. While given responsibility over finances as the company’s chief financial officer (CFO), he transferred money into his own private account – almost every fortnight, the judge noted – over a seven year period to fund lavish vacations and buy residential property.
Raneberg had “put into reality a somewhat fantasy life of the rich and famous” which “snowballed completely out of control,” Judge Geoffrey Muecke told the court.
Though Raneberg pled guilty to the embezzlement, he nevertheless had attempted desperately to forestall the inevitable. After his position was made redundant and he was let go in June of 2011, he fled to Thailand. Meanwhile, an internal audit revealed what sort of game he had been playing. He was caught at Sydney Airport in October and extradited to Adelaide.
 |
|||
 |
|
Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!! |
|
Raneberg was characterized during the trial as being introverted and given to fantasy. After he admitted his wrongdoing, he was sentenced to the ten and half year sentence with a six year four month non-parole period.
Meanwhile, Adam Bannister of Minter Ellison Adelaide did damage control, saying in a statement that “Minter Ellison Lawyers SA and NT acknowledge that the matter involving Craig Raneberg has been dealt with by the court. We thank our dedicated staff and our clients who have remained steadfast in their support of our firm.”
Posted by Daniel June
on July 26, 2012. Filed under Law Firm News,Minter Ellison.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Attorney Career Resources is sponsored by BCG Attorney Search, the nation's leading placement firm, specializing in law firm placements.
Departures from a law firm are complicated for any attorney, but for a partner the details can be quite intricate. Please note: First and foremost, the interests of your clients should be absolutely paramount. Consultation with existing ABA and state bar guidelines on firm transition is suggested. Below you will find a list of important considerations for partners when changing firms. You will also find suggested practices for maintaining relationships, as well as obligations from a legal and moral perspective. Before You Begin to Meet with New Firms It’s important to review any existing employment agreement with your former firm to make sure you are in compliance with all provisions (pay particular attention to provisions regarding notice). Practice discretion with your existing firm until you [...]
May 23, 2013 Read More
 |
||
| Search Thousands of Legal Jobs | ||
|
Job Type: |
||
 |
||
|
Browse Jobs by Location: |
||
|
||
| Keyword Search: | ||
|
||
Zafar Hasan
July 27, 2012 at 5:10 am
Posted by Zafar Hasan: As a Muslim former associate at Foley & Lardner, I am still amazed at the psychology of fraud in play here.
Raneberg has demonstrated a peculiar cocktail of arrogance, self-loathing and denial — not an easy combination to come by.
Arrogance is obviously represented by the crimes themselves and the feeling of invincibility which must have made Raneberg think he would get away with this. Self-loathing because he was obviously unsatisfied with his station in life, even though he was CFO of a significant firm. And denial because even after getting he caught, he attempted to flee, suggesting a lack of remorse and continuing view that he could escape accountability for his actions.
You can get pretty far in life but without some introspection, things can still end badly. Zafar Hasan