Newsletter Subscription


Enter your email address and start getting breaking law firm and legal news right now!



Every Alert   Alert once a day

 

Ruling on Health Care Law Due Within Weeks from Supreme Court

 

Roughly four dozen people have been able to keep quiet about the Supreme Court’s upcoming ruling regarding the constitutionality of President Barack Obama’s overhaul of health care. The court should issue a ruling on the law in the next week or two. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that a stream of “rumors and fifth-hand accounts” have appeared in various media about how the court was going to rule.

 

“My favorite among the press pieces wisely observed: `At the Supreme Court … those who know don’t talk, and those who talk don’t know,’” she said.



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


 

The justices know all of the information already since they voted the week that they heard arguments in the case. Others who know the information include the four clerks that work for each of the nine justices.

 

Despite the 36 clerks growing up and living in the age of technology, they have kept quiet when it comes to discussing how the court will rule on the law. Stephen Miller, a former clerk for Justice Antonin Scalia, is now a lawyer who said that clerks are warned about remaining silent. All of the clerks were warned by Chief Justice William Rehnquist when Miller worked as a clerk. “Leaks were unacceptable,” Miller remembers Rehnquist stating sternly. Miller also said that a clerk who reveals information would be ostracized in the legal industry, ruining a potential legal career before it even starts. Miller said that if a clerk were to leak information and not get caught, the whole class of clerks would be stuck with the stigma.

 

“So what’s in it for a clerk to leak?” Miller said.

Did you like this? Share it:

Posted by on June 25, 2012. Filed under Legal News,Supreme Court. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>