<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Law Firms for Women Announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/06/14/best-law-firms-for-women-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/06/14/best-law-firms-for-women-announced/</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2012/06/14/best-law-firms-for-women-announced/comment-page-1/#comment-71125</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=44642#comment-71125</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or are we celebrating very low percentages here? I guess, as they say, everything is relative, but shouldn&#039;t we be rewarding firms that have near or in excess of 50% female partners?  More than 50% of law students are women...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or are we celebrating very low percentages here? I guess, as they say, everything is relative, but shouldn&#8217;t we be rewarding firms that have near or in excess of 50% female partners?  More than 50% of law students are women&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
