Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe seems to have found that elusive balance in compensation policy that fulfills the demands of productivity, man-hours billed, and transparency, all at the same time. Many seemed skeptical when in February Orrick announced its bonus policy for associates claiming to fix compensations based on the following criteria:
It’s clear that Orrick Herrington has been able to juggle the equations and come out with fair compensation packages for associates, without sacrificing an iota of transparency. That by itself is no minor feat.
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe 2011 Merit Bonus Distribution Table for All US Associates
| Associate | Managing Associate | Senior Associate | |
| Range | # % | # % | # % |
| Less than $5,000 | 7 7% | 3 3% | 1 1% |
| $5,000 – $14,999 | 53 53% | 12 14% | 4 6% |
| $15,000 – $24,999 | 40 40% | 22 25% | 5 7% |
| $25,000 – $34,999 | 38 43% | 1 1% | |
| $35,000 – $44,999 | 13 15% | 27 39% | |
| $45,000 – $54,999 | 23 33% | ||
| $55,000 and above | 9 13% | ||
| GRAND TOTAL | 100 100% | 88 100% | 70 100% |
According to the firm, barring those who joined after June 30, 2011, eighty percent of all US associates received a merit bonus, and the score is consistent with the percent of associates who received merit bonuses in 2010.
To further the balance of incentives vs. required criteria, Orrick created a “Time Lag Incentive Program” on the following lines to include time entry based performance:
On all counts, Orrick continues to lead the market when it comes to fair compensation and bonus packages of associates among the big law firms.
Recent comments