Newsletter Subscription


Enter your email address and start getting breaking law firm and legal news right now!



Every Alert   Alert once a day

 

‘White Only’ Pool Sign Ruled Discriminatory

A landlord’s claim has been dismissed by the Ohio Civil Rights Commission that a ‘white only’ pool sign was an historical antique sign and ruled that it was discriminatory.

“At this point, it means that we believe that it’s probable that discrimination has occurred,” commission spokeswoman Brandi Martin said.

Cincinnati landlord Jamie Hein had been accused of discriminating against an African-American girl back in December with a ‘white only’ sign posted at her swimming pool. Hein said that the sign was an antique and a decoration.

“I’m not a bad person,” said Jamie Hein. “I don’t have any problem with race at all. It’s a historical sign.”



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


The sign from the case says: “Public Swimming Pool, White Only.” The sign as the date 1931 on it and it is from Alabama.

The discrimination charge was filed by Micheal Gunn, who took offense to the sign. He filed the complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.

“At every step, we try to resolve the matter. We will attempt conciliation,” Martin said.  “The goal is to resolve the matter, to find a means by which both parties would be satisfied in some sort of resolution or settlement.”

Neither Hein nor her attorney appeared in court, which Martin claims was unexpected, since Hein was asking that the original ruling be reconsidered by the commission.

Should a compromise not be met, and if Hein appeals the decision again, the issue will hit the state’s attorney general and both of the parties involved will be deposed.

Hein did not express any apologies for the racist origins of the sign that was displayed at the entrance to her pool. Hein claims she collects antiques and was given the sign as a gift. She also said in an interview that her pool is on private property and everyone getting in her pool must ask for permission first even though the sign appears to be about a public pool.

Gunn told the court that his family previously “had unrestricted access to the pool area.” Hein disputed this claim, saying that everyone, even her father, must ask permission before swimming in the pool.

“We invited my daughter, who is African-American, to visit and swim in the pool for the Memorial Day weekend,” Gunn wrote in the complaint. “The owner, Jamie Hein, accused my daughter of making the pool ‘cloudy’ because she used chemicals in her hair. Days later, she posted a sign on the gate to the pool which reads, ‘Public Swimming Pool, White Only.’”

Hein claims that the sign was not related to Gunn’s daughter being in the pool and that the sign had already been posted when the party occurred. She also said that the sign cannot be seen when the gate to the fence is open.

Gunn wrote in the complaint that he moved out of the property Hein owns back in June “in order to not expose my daughter to the sign and the humiliation of the message.”

It was found on September 29 by the Ohio Civil Rights Commission that Hein violated the Ohio Civil Rights Act by putting the sign up at the pool. Hein then asked to have the decision reconsidered. Since then, the sign has been stolen.

“I’ve never said anything to that child,” Hein said. “If I have to stick up for my white rights, I have to stick up for my white rights. It goes both ways.”

Did you like this? Share it:

Posted by on January 13, 2012. Filed under Breaking News,Home. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

9 Responses to ‘White Only’ Pool Sign Ruled Discriminatory

  1. Anonymous

    January 13, 2012 at 11:21 am

    Holy cow! It’s a private pool. If she wants to post a sign on her property, it’s her property. Who can say boo? I say if something offends, by all means post the sign.

  2. Anonymous

    January 13, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    you have lost your mind whoever you is this 2012 that jim crow s..t is long gone

  3. Anonymous

    January 13, 2012 at 2:26 pm

    i love this country

  4. Anonymous

    January 13, 2012 at 4:54 pm

    “you have lost your mind whoever you is this 2012 that jim crow s..t is long gone”
    All I can say to your post is YIKES; did you graduate high school?

  5. Anonymous

    January 13, 2012 at 6:10 pm

    WOW! What if Mr. Gunn put a sign on his private door that said” Keep out Wet Dog smelling white people”? People don’t think about how it would feel if the hate they put out is poured back on them!!!

  6. Anonymous

    January 14, 2012 at 8:36 am

    IGNORANCE!!! And people say race is no longer a issue… White people still think they are superior. All the wrong they have done in the name of Jesus… SMH!!! She needs to be slapped one good time!

  7. Anonymous

    January 14, 2012 at 1:39 pm

    Holy cow! You don’t understand at all. This is not simply private property, it is a place of public accommodation. Time for you to read up on the law

  8. Anonymous

    January 14, 2012 at 8:52 pm

    Well, this should be easy. I think that this charmers closing comments pretty much deflated her defense. ” white rights” ???? Ahem, this case is closed.

  9. Anonymous

    February 6, 2012 at 11:26 am

    It may be a private pool but it is public lodging. According to fair housing/equal opportunity she cannot bar someone based on race.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>