Legal Fight Initiated Over $147 Million Sale of East Hampton Mansion
Legal Fight Initiated Over $147 Million Sale of East Hampton Mansion
Hedge Fund Sues Puerto Rico for Restructuring Law
Hedge Fund Sues Puerto Rico for Restructuring Law
ExxonMobil Accused of Unlawful Discrimination in Hiring by LGBT Rights Group
ExxonMobil Accused of Unlawful Discrimination in Hiring by LGBT Rights...
Award Issued Against RJ Reynolds Unlikely to Stand
Award Issued Against RJ Reynolds Unlikely to Stand
Job Listings

The Ecuador Court Affirms The $18 Billion Ruling Against Chevron

On Tuesday, the first-level appeal court in Ecuador, also known as the Provincial Court of Justice of Sucumbios, upheld a lower court’s $18 billion judgment against Chevron for destroying a large portion of the Amazon rainforest through its historical oil operations, and by contaminating everything. Does this ruling mean that Chevron and the Ecuadorian plaintiffs are finally going to settle, as Patrick Radder Keefe suggested in The New Yorker back on Wednesday?

As it has become quite typical in the 18-year saga, the opposing camps issued a dueling press release on the latest development.

The Ecuadorian plaintiffs’ representative, Karen Hinton, hailed the decision as a ”confirmation of Chevron’s extraordinary greed and criminal misconduct in Ecuador.” The ruling, said Hinton, ”is based on overwhelming scientific evidence presented at trial that proved Chevron deliberately dumped billions of gallons of toxic waste that poisoned the water supply of the Amazon rainforest, destroying indigenous groups and causing a major outbreak of cancers and other diseases that are continually threatening thousands of innocent lives.”

On the other hand, the Chevron spokesman Kent Robertson cited the ruling as further proof of the company’s core contention that the Ecuadorian courts can’t be trusted to reach a fair conclusion in the case. ”Today’s decision is another glaring example of the politicization and corruption of Ecuador’s judiciary that has plagued this fraudulent case from the start,” said Robertson.
The statements from both sides barely suggested that the peace talks are about to get going. But even if the statements are no more than boilerplate rhetoric, there are other reasons to be skeptical about The New Yorker’s settlement theory.



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Reefe had noted that ”Chevron has one final appeal in Ecuador, to the country’s Supreme Court.” But, he continues on, ”to proceed with that appeal and stop the plaintiffs from trying to collect on the judgment in the meantime, Chevron would have to post a multi-billion dollar bond, which, given its jaundiced view of the rule of law in Ecuador, it seems unlikely to do.”

The first flaw with Reefe’s analysis is to take for granted that there is an appeal bond requirement. Chevron’s Robertson stated that, on Chevron’s interpretation of Ecuadorian law, an appeal on the bond is not necessary. Even Pablo Fajardo, who is the lead Ecuadorian lawyer for the plaintiffs, stated that only Chevron ”might first be required to post a bond.”

The reality is more likely that no one really knows what the Ecuadorian law is on this point. That may mean that in practice, the Ecuadorian court can just make it up as it goes on. The parties will submit requests for clarification of the ruling by week’s end, and when the court rules on those clarifications, most likely within the next few weeks, it is either going to demand a bond or not. If the court ultimately does end up demand an appeal bond, then there is a strong enough case that Chevron is going to refuse. Then the judgment would most likely become final and enforceable.

Did you like this? Share it:
The Ecuador Court Affirms The $18 Billion Ruling Against Chevron by

Tagged: , ,

Posted by on January 9, 2012. Filed under Business News,Home,World News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • http://www.ccrider27.com ccrider27

    For the Chevron attorney to call the Ecuadoran courts corrupt is the height of hilarity. Over the last 20 years, no court system in the world has become nearly as corrupt as that of the US.

    One only has to look at the Citizens United vs. FEC to see that. Corporations rule the courts in America just as they rule every other facet of life in the US.

    If anything, the judges Roberts and Alito, both of whom fell all over themselves claiming the slavish adherence to stare decisis during their confirmation hearings, should have immediately been impeached.

    It is no longer a Supreme Court. It is now just a Whore Court for American corporate greed.

    For the US attorney to call the Ecuadoran Court corrupt is nothing short of hysterical.

 

 

Job of the Day
Legal Secretary
USA-CA-Thousand Oaks

Legal Secretary needed for growing and busy Workers' Compensation Defense Law firm in Thousand Oaks, CA. The successful candidate will have at least 2 years of Workers' Compensation experience an...