The New York City-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled a ban on class actions in Fensterstock’s student loan agreement was unconscionable under California law and so US Supreme Court has vacated a federal appeals court decision that allowed a solo practitioner to avoid arbitration in a lawsuit that claims his student loan company charged hidden penalties.
Read the original article here:
Supreme Court Vacates 2nd Circuit Win for Lawyer Challenging Student Loan Fees
Posted by EmploymentCrossing
on June 17, 2011. Filed under Home.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
 |
||
| Search Thousands of Legal Jobs | ||
|
Job Type: |
||
 |
||
|
Browse Jobs by Location: |
||
|
||
| Keyword Search: | ||
|
||
Recent comments