1,000,000 + Attorneys and Legal Staff - Legal employers hire more people on LawCrossing than any other site.
Namesake of Morris Hardwick Schneider Sued for Embezzlement
Namesake of Morris Hardwick Schneider Sued for Embezzlement
Ninth Circuit Says FedEx Drivers are Employees, Not Independent Contractors
Ninth Circuit Says FedEx Drivers are Employees, Not Independent Contra...
Dykema Grabs Product Liability Superstar
Dykema Grabs Product Liability Superstar
Graduates of Iowa Law Schools May Not Have to Take Bar Exam
Graduates of Iowa Law Schools May Not Have to Take Bar Exam
Job Listings

Oregon Supreme Court Sides With Employer in Pot Ruling

marijuana, potIn what one legal expert called “a shot across the bow” of medical marijuana supporters, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled Thursday that an employee could be fired for drug use even if holding a state-issued medical marijuana card.

In its 5-2 ruling, the Oregon Supreme Court based the decision on the fact state law is trumped by federal law, which lists marijuana as an illegal drug.

Justice Rives Kistler wrote the majority opinion. In it, he declared “state law does not require an employer to accommodate an employee’s use of marijuana to treat a disabling medical condition.”

Then it notes, “the federal Controlled Substances Act prohibits the possession of marijuana without regard to whether it is used for medicinal purposes.”

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


The ruling overturns an earlier decision by the Bureau of Labor and Industries, the Oregonian reports. The state bureau had ruled in favor of a worker who was fired after notifying his employer that he used medical marijuana prior to a scheduled drug test.  A discrimination suit followed, claiming Emerald Steel Fabricators failed to make reasonable accommodations for the workers disability.

While employers’ organizations, such as Associated Oregon Industries, praising the move, the Bureau of Labor and Industries stood by its decision. Its chief, Brad Avakian, said the decision “seriously undercuts” the states medical marijuana act, which was approved by voters in 1998.

Oregon Supreme Court Sides With Employer in Pot Ruling by

  • http://opinion8d.net Kit (attorney)

    It seems that the ORegon Court really wanted to rule on medical marijuana, and is overreaching. This case could have been disposed of on the grounds that employers may forbid any type of medication which interferes with perception,motion, alertness, clear thinking or contains hallucinogenic properties.

    Especially in light of the fact that there is no known disease for which lack of marijuana will kill the employee, so it is not like depriving him of insulin. It seems obvious that employers can forbid use of narcotic pain killers at work if they choose, or drinking, or smoking, so they can forbid marijuana.

    THere was no need for the Court to reach out and deal with the issue of the legality of State medical marijuana laws.

Tagged: , , , , , ,

Posted by on April 16, 2010. Filed under Home,Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

 

 

Job of the Day
Real Estate Associate
USA-TX-Dallas

Our client is a north Dallas law firm who seeks a Real Estate Development Associate.  The ideal candidate will have 2-4 years law firm experience concentrated in representing real estate develope...