Home

Judge Shows Ardor to Whistle-Blowers in Fidelity Case
Download PDF

A Federal Judge in Boston has ruled that mutual fund companies are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act just as other companies who directly hire workers.  Mutual fund firms, such as Fidelity Investments, hire management companies to invest their money.  Fidelity had argued that because they do not have workers, as such, that the whistle-blower law should not apply to them.

Jackie Hosang Lawson and Jonathan Zang were former employees at Fidelity who witnessed what they saw to be improper actions by Fidelity.  Upon notifying their supervisors of the problems, they perceived that they were treated poorly and unfairly.  Lawson and Zang filed separate suits against Fidelity, but the two were combined in U.S. District Court.

Lawson’s attorney, Indira Talwani, is quoted by Reuters as saying, “”This is a critical case because Sarbanes-Oxley was designed to protect investors.  Mutual funds are the major way that Americans invest their money.”

  
What
Where


Judge Douglas Woodlock did not rule for the plaintiffs in their wrongful discharge suits.

 

Most Popular

Legal Career Resources

July 26, 2016 Making Partner Is No Party

Summary: Once an attorney makes partner, their job does not become a big party like some associates seem to think when starting out. Read 21 Reasons Why Being a Large Law Firm Partner Is More Difficult Than Being an Associate […]

read more

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top