A Look at the Backend of the Intel/AMD Fight

Fri, Nov 13, 2009

Home, Law Firms

When giants like Intel and AMD go to war, its often the law firms that come out on top. Here’s a quick rundown of the firms involved in the fight, now that a settlement has been reached.

AMD was primarily represented by O’Melveny & Myers, both here and in the EU.

Intel had a host of firms handling different parts of the fight. Gibson Dunn had Intel’s business for the Deleware case while Skadden had the lead in the EU. Howrey was involved in suing the insurance company for coverage of Gibson Dunn’s bills for the defense. Bingham McCutchen was lead counself for Intel on multiple class action suits and co-cousnsel with Gibson Dunn in Deleware.

The big loser now that the two companies have come to terms will be O’Melveny, who will lose its top client once the dust has settled. Gibson Dunn and Skadden won’t have the same issue, since federal regulators are still sniffing about for a fight and any state or federal cases brought forward aren’t affected by the settlement.

Share this story:
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Live
  • Sphinn
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Simpy
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • Faves
  • Netvouz
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl

Related posts:

  1. Intel and AMD Reach $1.2 Billion Settlement
  2. Gibson Dunn Cuts 36 Staff
  3. Gibson Dunn Named Best Litigation Firm in U.S.
  4. Gibson Dunn Revenues Up, No Layoffs Planned
  5. The Legal Teams Behind the Conan – Leno Fight
  6. Gibson Dunn to Launch Brazilian Office

, , , , , , ,




Leave a Reply


Attorney Resume
Every year, Attorney Resume's expert resume and cover letter preparation services help thousands of attorneys and law students get jobs; click here to find out how Attorney Resume can help you!

Attorney Resume

Tell a Friend

Your Name (required)Your e-mail address (required)
Your Friend's Name (required)Your Friend's e-mail address (required)
Your Comments: