<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maria Shriver &#8211; Breakin&#8217; the Law!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/10/14/maria-shriver-breakin-the-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/10/14/maria-shriver-breakin-the-law/</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:01:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/10/14/maria-shriver-breakin-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-18927</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=17373#comment-18927</guid>
		<description>How in the world can such a law be considered constitutional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the world can such a law be considered constitutional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/10/14/maria-shriver-breakin-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-18888</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=17373#comment-18888</guid>
		<description>So, does this new law also apply to everyday citizens, or just celebrities? Because I resent those cameras at intersections that take photos for the states profit. And I also find it offensive being &quot;photographed&quot; while shopping, or any other activity&#039;s that are under prying eyes of big brother, especially stores that have so many cameras that your on eight at any given moment. I&#039;m not a shoplifter, and don&#039;t like being treated like one. And that &quot;experiment&quot; in Philadelphia where the whole city is under surveillance, with camera&#039;s on every street corner, aint no friggin way I&#039;ll even consider living under those conditions. Paint ball guns will cost the city a fortune in lens cleaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, does this new law also apply to everyday citizens, or just celebrities? Because I resent those cameras at intersections that take photos for the states profit. And I also find it offensive being &#8220;photographed&#8221; while shopping, or any other activity&#8217;s that are under prying eyes of big brother, especially stores that have so many cameras that your on eight at any given moment. I&#8217;m not a shoplifter, and don&#8217;t like being treated like one. And that &#8220;experiment&#8221; in Philadelphia where the whole city is under surveillance, with camera&#8217;s on every street corner, aint no friggin way I&#8217;ll even consider living under those conditions. Paint ball guns will cost the city a fortune in lens cleaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

