<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ginsburg: Supreme Court Job Available &#8220;Soon&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/16/ginsburg-supreme-court-job-available-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/16/ginsburg-supreme-court-job-available-soon/</link>
	<description>Legal Industry News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:33:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/16/ginsburg-supreme-court-job-available-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-21197</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=9054#comment-21197</guid>
		<description>Umm - might you be jumping to conclusions?  When was the last portrait taken?  The one you post here does not include Sotomayor - I&#039;m thinking she may be referring to the fact that Sotomayor&#039;s appointment means a new portrait will be taken soon.
But without knowing when the last one was done, it&#039;s only speculation. Like this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm &#8211; might you be jumping to conclusions?  When was the last portrait taken?  The one you post here does not include Sotomayor &#8211; I&#8217;m thinking she may be referring to the fact that Sotomayor&#8217;s appointment means a new portrait will be taken soon.<br />
But without knowing when the last one was done, it&#8217;s only speculation. Like this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Even</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/16/ginsburg-supreme-court-job-available-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-6454</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Even</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=9054#comment-6454</guid>
		<description>How can a judge have &quot;no personal politics?&quot; Every thinking person has personal politics. 

What we need is a broad spectrum of political ideas on the court. Right now there are no liberals -- just 4 moderate conservatives, 3 far-right conservatives, and 2 fascistic nutjobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can a judge have &#8220;no personal politics?&#8221; Every thinking person has personal politics. </p>
<p>What we need is a broad spectrum of political ideas on the court. Right now there are no liberals &#8212; just 4 moderate conservatives, 3 far-right conservatives, and 2 fascistic nutjobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/16/ginsburg-supreme-court-job-available-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=9054#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>With the recent tradition of the justices being selected based on their politics, I can only hope that the next justice is selected based only on how ´fair´ they are.  It´s high time for a justice that has no personal politics and works only to uphold the consitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the recent tradition of the justices being selected based on their politics, I can only hope that the next justice is selected based only on how ´fair´ they are.  It´s high time for a justice that has no personal politics and works only to uphold the consitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.jdjournal.com/2009/03/16/ginsburg-supreme-court-job-available-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-6396</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jdjournal.com/?p=9054#comment-6396</guid>
		<description>Justice Ginsburg has certainly exceeded her time in this position by her recent comments on Foreign Law.  She has now lost all credibility that she even knows what she is doing when she votes on matters before the court.  She should do the right thing and resign.  Her usefulness has past!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Ginsburg has certainly exceeded her time in this position by her recent comments on Foreign Law.  She has now lost all credibility that she even knows what she is doing when she votes on matters before the court.  She should do the right thing and resign.  Her usefulness has past!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

