Comments on: California Supreme Court Grants Whistleblower Protection

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:39:26 +0000

The ninth circuit just upheld judges hearing cases in which they’re named defendant, and dismissing them before a recusal petition could be filed. Upheld on… no grounds, just retribution.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:50:18 +0000

To any future lawyers, give it up. The “rule of law” is no longer valid in the US. The justice dept. is so blatantly corrupt that unless you work for the government, you’ll never win a case in a US court. Judges no longer follow the law they make up their own, and if they don’t like you you risk jail, seriously. Lawyers are afraid to take certain cases in LA because of the chance of disbarment, and jail. What kind of country do we have here? A terrorist regime.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:41:44 +0000

Likewise, who can one turn to to uphold the law in Los Angeles superior court? The taking of illegal payments, by judges, given by the county, resulting in judgments for the county, in most cases heard by a judge. And the abduction and false imprisonment of Richard Fine, by judge Yaffe, and the LA sheriff, complete with false court filings, have been rejected for investigation, by the FBI, DOJ, the sheriff dept. itself, the governor, based on “not enough evidence to initiate an investigation”, after enough hard evidence had been given them for a solid conviction. When the enforcers of the law, won’t, where do you go?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:03:54 +0000

How does one go about reporting WASTE and ABUSE of AUTHORITY? I have some whistleblowing of my own to do, but am not sure which way to turn. Any assistance would be most appreciated. Thank you.

By: Erik Even

Erik Even — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:43:05 +0000

Seriously, I’ll delete your posts if you keep coming here and doing that. Most professionally-moderated discussion boards would have deleted your posts automatically.

I’ve left them because your posts are worth reading. But if you’re new to the Internet — people don’t put up with ALL CAPS.

By: CAROLE M ARBUCKLE

CAROLE M ARBUCKLE — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:43:30 +0000

DON’T DO WHAT? VOICE THE TRUTH?

By: CAROLE M ARBUCKLE

CAROLE M ARBUCKLE — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:10:47 +0000

SHOUTING BECAUSE THE PRIOR APPELLATE COURT DECISION WOULD HAVE BARRED ANY FURTHER WHISTLEBLOWERE CLAIMS SINCE THE STATE PERSONNEL BOARD HAS NOT ISSUED POSITIVE FINDINGS IN A WHISTLE BLOWER COMPLAINT FOR YEARS. YOU REALLY NEED TO READ THE REVERSED APPELLATE PUBLISHED OPINION TO REALIZE THE SHOUTING, EXCITEMENT AND MAGNATUDE. THIS WAS NEVER ABOUT THE MONEY…BUT ABOUT VIOLENCE IN THE WORKPLACE FOR REPORTING FRADULENT ACTIVITY WITHIN STATE CIVIL SERVICE…..

By: Erik Even

Erik Even — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:14:08 +0000

Yeah, that’s still really annoying and unpleasant to read. On behalf of the entire Internet community: don’t do that.

By: BobC562

BobC562 — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:43:07 +0000

Carole, all this means is that you didn’t have to file a writ prior to filing your civil action. You still have to prove your case. And Erik’s right, why are you shouting?

By: Erik Even

Erik Even — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:29:13 +0000

Um.. why are you yelling?

By: CAROLE M ARBUCKLE

CAROLE M ARBUCKLE — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:30:08 +0000

THE SUPREME COURT WAS HONEST AND EQUITIBLE AND BACKED TMY HONESTY AND INTEGRITY. THIS SENDS A MESSAGE TO CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENTAL MANAGEMENT THAT ILLEGAL ACTS CANNOT BE COVERED UP BY THREATENING AND RETAIALATING AGAINST THEIR SUBORTINATES. FINALLY AFTER 7 YEARS…JUSTICE. THANK YOU SUPREME COURT JUSTICES FOR A UNANOMOUS DECISION.