Pier 1 Employee Sues Company for Forced Maternity Leave
Pier 1 Employee Sues Company for Forced Maternity Leave
Coerced into Sex by Using Threat of Tax Penalty
Coerced into Sex by Using Threat of Tax Penalty
Convicted ‘Ivy League Killer’ Given Maximum Life with No Parole
Convicted ‘Ivy League Killer’ Given Maximum Life with No P...
Video Shows Prosecutor Being Slammed by Panel of Judges
Video Shows Prosecutor Being Slammed by Panel of Judges
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Job Listings

Supreme Court Rules Against Utah Teacher’s Union In Political Speech Case

The Supreme Court dealt a blow to Utah’s teachers union on Tuesday by limiting how it can collect contributions from its donors.  The high court ruled that the union could not collect donations for its political action committee by automatically deducting money from their members’ paychecks.

The precedent was set in a very similar “paycheck protection” law in Idaho.

“Idaho’s law does not restrict political speech, but rather declines to promote that speech by allowing public employee checkoffs for political activities,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the court’s 6-3 decision. “Such a decision is reasonable in light of the state’s interest in avoiding the appearance that carrying out the public’s business is tainted by partisan political activity.”

The 10th District Court, which covers Utah, waited to act on Utah’s 2001 law to see how the Supreme Court would rule on Idaho’s law, which is part of the 9th District Court.



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Did you like this? Share it:
Supreme Court Rules Against Utah Teacher's Union In Political Speech Case by

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by on February 25, 2009. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
  • Anonymous

    The High Court made a rule about collecting donation.The president was set in similar law.This law does not restrict political speech, but rather declines to promote that speech by allowing public employee checkoffs for political activities