Dorsey & Whitney Sees Flat 2008 Revenue

Mon, Feb 2, 2009

Home, Law Firms, Money

Minneapolis-based Dorsey & Whitney saw flat revenues, with a small decrease in profits per partner for 2008.

Gross revenues were just over $367 million, and profits per partner were $661,000, a 1.6% decrease from the prior year.

The firm’s activity was even across practice areas with both litigation and corporate work accounting for significant chunks of revenue. Litigation accounted for approximately 35% of the firm’s revenue this year.

The firm also saw a fair amount of corporate advisory and transactional work, including a close to $1 billion bank financing for an Indian gaming project. Corporate work represented 22% of gross revenue.

Also, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out a decade old case that could have cost the firm up to $4 million in malpractice verdicts.

Share this story:
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Live
  • Sphinn
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Simpy
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • Faves
  • Netvouz
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl

Related posts:

  1. Dinsmore & Shohl Sees 2008 Revenue Rise; Recruits in Midwest
  2. Reed Smith’s Revenue up 10% in 2008
  3. Kirkland & Ellis Revenue Up, Profits Flat
  4. Dorsey & Whitney Report Decline in Revenue and Profits
  5. Bingham Sees Increased Profits, Revenue — Credits Downsizing
  6. Dorsey & Whitney Cuts 55 Staffers Firmwide [Update]

, , , , , ,




0 Comments For This Post

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. [...] firm saw flat revenues, with a small decrease in profits per partner, in [...]

Leave a Reply


JD2B.com
Visit JD2B.com to stay abreast of developments in the blogosphere; the site currently links to 56 law and pre-law student blogs as well as 28 of the most important law prof blogs!

JD2B

Tell a Friend

Your Name (required)Your e-mail address (required)
Your Friend's Name (required)Your Friend's e-mail address (required)
Your Comments: