Reardon Dealt Setback in Fight with Former Associate

(No Ratings Yet)

Loading...

Speaking of former associates suing a firm:

Connecticut plaintiffs lawyer Robert I. Reardon, the so-called “Titan of Torts,”  has suffered a setback in a lawsuit brought against him by former Reardon Law Firm associate Angelo A. Ziotas.

Before leaving the firm, Ziotas asked Reardon whether he would get a pro-rata bonus for the year, and was told he would. Under the non-negotiable contract Ziotas signed in 1992, bonuses were based on a list of factors: seniority, business generation, productivity, professional ability, work profitability, pro bono work, outside activities and loyalty to the firm.

  

What

Where

Search Jobs

Reardon never paid the bonus.

Appellate Court Judge Alexandra DiPentima, writing for a unanimous panel, sent the matter back to the trial court to determine whether Reardon’s contract breach was arbitrary, unreasonable or done in bad faith. Such a finding could double the former associate’s $50,000 bonus, and add attorney fees on top of mounting offer-of-judgment interest.

The case has wider implications for businesses, in that it establishes that an employee can be contractually entitled to a bonus even if the precise method for calculating it isn’t spelled out in the employment contract and the employer is against paying it.

Ziotas is now a partner in Stamford’s prominent Silver, Golub & Teitell.

Via Law.com Small Firm Business.